Showing posts with label Jim Stone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jim Stone. Show all posts

Friday, February 10, 2017

TRUMP POLICY PURPOSELY CONTINUES FUELING TERRORISM,ORVILLE DAM DOOMED?ROGUE JEWISH GROUP IN TREASURY PUSHES IRAN SANCTIONS


I have been hating on EVERY President starting with a peanut farmer,then followed by a B grade actor,a nightmare,a sexual predator,a recurring nightmare,a closeted homosexual,and this latest favor of kool aid sure looks like Tyrannies right hand has arrived. To each his own,but just know I go forward by what my eyes see and my ears hear, not on twitter or sound bites. Rex Tillerson? for real?,generals here,there, and everywhere...might be a clue....Eliot fricking Abrams???? seals the damn deal for me...same old same old,take care 

February 8, 2017 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - In the American cartoon show G.I. Joe, no matter how badly the heroes of G.I. Joe battered the villains of the Cobra organization the previous week, they would return with even more men, weapons, and vehicles. No explanation was ever given as to where Cobra drew these vast resources from, and no explanation was needed - because it was just a children's cartoon.





In real life, however, a similar scenario is unfolding, and a similarly childish narrative is being foisted upon the public to conceal where real villains are drawing their vast resources from. Unlike in a children's cartoon, a real explanation is needed.

The threat of "terror," or "radical Islamist's" as US politicians and media refers to them, has become as cartoonist in reality as Cobra was in fiction.

Organizations like Al Qaeda and the self-proclaimed "Islamic State" (ISIS) appear to draw from inexhaustible reserves of money, men, material, weapons, and even vehicles. They appear capable of transiting national borders, even the seas with fighters, logistical support, and financial resources in quantities that would confound all but the largest, most competent global military forces. 

These terrorist organizations, espousing Wahhabi ideology originating in the Persian Gulf states of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, are waging war simultaneously in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and Libya, all while carrying out terrorist operations globally from North America and Europe to Eurasia and the Far East.

They are fighting the collective forces of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Russia, and Lebanon's Hezbollah.

Few nations on Earth possess the political, military, and financial resources required to create and sustain such a force, and fewer still, possess the motivation to do so.

A Travel Ban Addressing 


Not Even the Symptoms 

US President Donald Trump's executive order banning entry into the United States of citizens from Syria, Sudan, Iran, Iraq, Yemen,  Libya, and Somalia was predicated on protecting the American people from what the order claimed were "terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States."


The order makes specific reference to the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 on New York and Washington in which nearly 3,000 would die.

However, the ban in fact omits literally every nation from which the alleged hijackers on September 11 hailed - 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, 2 from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), 1 from Egypt, and one from Lebanon.

Louvre Attack Exposes 


Impotence of the Travel Ban 



More recently, amid the attack on France's Louvre, the suspect now identified as Abdallah Reda Refai El Hamahmy, was born in Egypt - not on President Trump's list - had traveled to France from the United Arab Emirates - also not on the list - where he had worked for two years as a lawyer. He had also previously traveled to Saudi Arabia - also not on the list - where his wife and child currently reside.

Despite none of the nations the Louvre attack suspect resided in or frequently traveled to being on President Trump's list, he would exclaim in a message posted on social media platform Twitter:

A new radical Islamic terrorist has just attacked in Louvre Museum in Paris. Tourists were locked down. France on edge again. GET SMART U.S.

Yet, by "getting smart," one assumes President Trump means the US should acquiesce to his executive order and the travel ban it authorized. Yet the ban would not have prevented Abdallah Reda Refai El Hamahmy from entering the United States, finding a knife, and attacking any target of his choosing.



It should be noted that suspected hijackers from Egypt and Lebanon, as well as the Louvre attack suspect, were members of or inspired by terrorist organizations funded and politically backed by Saudi Arabia and its Wahhabi neighbors.

In fact, the groups these terrorists are drawn from includes the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization from which Al Qaeda was originally gestated - and a group defended by US and European political interests from states attempting to dismantle their networks, under various excuses including "freedom of expression" and "democracy." 

In this sense, the US and Europe are not just failing to fight terrorism, they are intentionally fueling, aiding and abetting it.

Still, President Trump's supporters maintain that the list included in the executive order originated from the Obama administration, and that Saudi Arabia "may" be added later. However, recent events suggest otherwise.


Actions Speak Louder Than Words 

In addition to omitting Saudi Arabia from the list of nations included in his executive order's travel ban, President Trump would send US warship USS Cole to the coast of Yemen to provide security for Saudi ships in the region.

Saudi warships have been targeted amid the full-scale war Riyadh is waging against its Yemeni neighbors.



The USS Cole is of course the ship attacked in 2000 by Al Qaeda while at port in Aden, Yemen. Seventeen US sailors would die. It is unlikely that a single US warship can "protect" Saudi ships, but it could significantly increase the likelihood of Yemeni forces inadvertently hitting the US ship in an attempt to defend themselves against Saudi attacks.

The logical progression of events after an accidental strike on a US ship by Yemeni forces would be wider US involvement in the Yemeni conflict, on the side of Saudi Arabia - the nation President Trump's supporters believe "may" be added to the travel ban "later."

From Whence Terrorism Really Flows 

It is clear that terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda and ISIS - cited by US President Donald Trump as the pretext for his recent executive order - are creations and perpetuation's of joint US-Saudi collusion. They have jointly created a global mercenary force that can fight where their regular forces cannot, using tactics and methods on a scale that even their respective covert operations forces could never achieve.

And while it could not be any clearer that these terrorist organizations draw from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates - with US and European backing - the summation of their political, financial, and military resources, President Trump - despite vowing to fight and defeat terrorism - has doubled down on protecting this very source of their power.

By doing so, President Trump ensures that Al Qaeda and ISIS just like the fictional Cobra organization - reappears each week with more men, weapons, and vehicles - no matter how badly battered they were the previous week.

http://journal-neo.org/


Beware of Trump’s Double-game in the Middle East

http://journal-neo.org/2017/02/09/beware-of-trump-s-double-game-in-the-middle-east/


Source: Zero Hedge 

by Tyler Durden 

February 3, 2017 

Following the escalation on Friday morning, in which the US Treasury Department published a list of 13 Iranian individuals and 12 Iranian entities facing new restrictions following Iran's recent ballistic missile test, Tehran promptly denounced the latest round of sanctions imposed by the US and said it would retaliate - something it has previously said it would do - however added a new twist when Tehran announced it would impose legal restrictions on American individuals and entities helping "regional terrorist groups", a Foreign Ministry statement read as quoted by TV. 

For obvious reasons, this naming and shaming of US-based terrorists promises to be far more interesting than if Iran were to actually ban, say, the US national chess team. Such an action will quickly coalesce the world's attention on a handful of US entities, putting under a microscope all of their offshore activities. 

"The new sanctions ... are not compatible with America's commitments and resolution 2231 of the U.N. Security Council that endorsed the nuclear deal reached between Iran and six powers," the Iranian Foreign Ministry statement said late on Friday

Tehran said it will react accordingly to any U.S. measure aimed at the Iranian nation's interests. 

"In retaliation for the U.S. sanctions, Iran will impose legal restrictions on some American individuals and entities that were involved in helping and founding regional terrorist groups," the Foreign Ministry statement said. It said names of the entities and individuals would be announced later, although it was not clear when exactly that is. 

As reported earlier, on Friday, the US Treasury Department blacklisted 13 individuals and a dozen businesses as part of the sanctions. The majority of the individuals in question are from Iran, as well as three Chinese nationals and two Arabs. 

"Iran's continued support for terrorism and development of its ballistic missile program poses a threat to the region, to our partners worldwide, and to the United States," John E. Smith, acting director of the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, said. He added that in countering what he called "Iranian malign activity," Washington will not hesitate to put more pressure and restrictions "to address this behavior." 

Countering rising US rhetoric, Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, said in a twitter post that "Iran unmoved by threats as we derive security from our people." 

"We'll never initiate war, but we can only rely on our own means of defense," he stressed. Iran's Defense Minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan noted that Tehran "will not allow foreigners to interfere” in the country's defense issues and insisted “the test did not violate the nuclear deal or (UN) Resolution 2231." 

The international agreement referred to by the Iranian Foreign Ministry in its statement on counter sanctions against the US, is the so-called P5+1 agreement. The pact was signed by six major world powers (Russia, China, the US, Britain, France, and Germany) and Iran in July 2015. Under the treaty, Tehran agreed to reduce the number of its centrifuges by two-thirds. 

Late on Friday Paul Ryan said that despite the new sanctions, Iran's Nuclear Deal, key to keeping the price of oil from spiking, the Iran nuclear deal is likely to stay in place. That however may change depending on what US-based names Iran drops as helping "regional terrorist groups." Once Iran unveils the list, we will update this post. 
________ 


Source: PressTV 

Rogue Jewish group in US Treasury orchestrated Iran sanctions: Journalist 

OROVILLE DAM IS PROBABLY DOOMED UPDATE: Maybe not if they accept the complete death of the normal spillway.

UPDATE: They are going to just open up the damaged spillway and let it rip. That would be a good move as far as I see it, because it will put the worst erosion more than a thousand feet away from the top, rather than risk whatever happens if they use the overflow and put the erosion right at the top.

New damage proves probable doom

This photo above shows the damaged after they did a small release to see how the damage would progress if they tried to use the spillway. As you can see, it is total doom, because it is working its way up the dam rather than down it. The next photo down is making the rounds, claiming it was a maintenance issue. Though that might be possible, I still think it is improbable and that what has happened is the result of sabotage.

This doom photo to the left here shows it has progressed up the dam to where the maintenance trucks are in the photo below. The trucks in the maintenance photo could have been there for any reason. And IF they are at the point of the original failure (that is hard to determine but I don't think so) all it proves is that the democrats who have been destroying California for decades now chose to neglect things rather than repair them, and it is still their fault. This happened after Arnold was out, but I don't think he'd have done anything either because he's a worthless pocket stuffer as bad as any democrat.

What we are seeing at Oroville is cold hard proof that environmentalists, democrats, all of what has been running America lately have real consequences in the real world and it really does not matter how much they can spew about how great they are when we can look at the results right here. There is an extremely high chance of total catastrophe now. I was totally depressed last night over this, because there is true impending doom that would have NEVER happened in Trump's America and there is nothing at all that can be done about it now, we just have to watch whatever happens unfold.

more on the dam and other 'stuff' from Jim Stone here


http://journal-neo.org/2017/02/09/beware-of-trump-s-double-game-in-the-middle-east/

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

STONE:GAS/MEXICO/VIOLENCE,ASSANGE/HANNITY,MARIAH SABOTAGED,CARRIERS,FORD AND CHEVY....

By Jim Stone


Gas situation in Mexico

Anonymous sent:

Cartel
Hello Jim, any update on the situation in Mexico, I live in Mexico City and in seems that all this stuff of blocking roads and gas stations is in full action, tomorrow January 4th people are asking to block major banks branches and shopping malls. This is real? because there are a lot of political actors behind scenes. Any thoughts?"

My response: The gas shutdown is real. On Dec 31, the day before the big event, I filled a 20 liter gas can I had, and smelled gas in the car. The gas can was sealed. I pulled into another gas station and checked it. Unbelievably, it was leaking through a pin hole in the side. So I ran into the gas station, bought a 20 liter water bottle, emptied it, and poured the gas in. Now I have so much gas in addition to what I already purchased that the "mosquito" Fiat I have is going to run for a bare minimum of 6 weeks if we waste gas like normal. If i try to save gas it ought to last 12 weeks. So a leaky gas can marked the end of my gas drama. I'll see what is up at the stations. But I won't be impacted it for a good long time.

Word on the street is that people are going to go absolutely ballistic over the gas situation, so I will have to wait and see. Major protests are scheduled for the city I am in. Claudia has already informed me that I will not be going!

[In Mexico when they speak about 'people',what they really mean are the cartel's like here D.C]

Mixed reactions to Assange with Hannity

Image result for IMAGE OF Assange with Hannity
Some are saying it's not him, others are saying it is. I am undecided, but will say this: He was taken from the embassy in early October, right when they said his internet got cut. I watched a live cam someone set up that night. He was not there afterward. Whatever happened after that is whatever happened. And if he is not the real Assange now, he's on our side anyway so the point is moot.
[Russia NOT the source D.C]


One big possibility: It is the real Assange, but he's been put through hell and might not even know it. Maybe evil people had him, and lost control of him after Trump won. Any possibility is on the table, but one thing is certain: He was not at the embassy after the "internet was cut".
[Then there is this from Hillary's hit team from media matters who are in it up to their eye balls on the cover up of all things pizza D.C]

America's aircraft carriers docked

I have read numerous reports around the web that state America's aircraft carriers are all docked

Then I got reminded to post it when Anonymous sent:


Hey Jim! What do you make of Obama docking all of Americas air craft carriers. Keep up the good work.

My response: If this is true and not just internet rumor (and it probably is true) it would obviously be done before kicking off a huge war Obama wanted America to lose. That's a no brainer. But there is one huge problem Obama faces if that is the goal

What would that problem be? Answer: Russia is not stupid, nor is China, and absent America launching nukes, I am certain Russia is going to be willing to absorb all losses and ignore all provocations over the next two weeks and wait for Trump to put it right.

No doubt China is upset about Trump's attitude toward them, but there is no way China could ever deny that Trump has the correct attitude. It is not something they could justify war over, and I doubt they'd actually want war anyway. Putin clearly does not want a war. So what will Obama's bringing the aircraft carriers home actually accomplish? Sadly for him, I'd say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING except the saving of a little cash. I bet that's just where they will sit too - in American harbors, once Trump gets in. They will no doubt be sent out for training exercises but for as long as Trump is president, my guess is that is all they will be used for.
[Last weekend, when commenting on China's public demonstration of its one and only aircraft carrier, which China then proceeded to sail in close proximity to Taiwan to make a clear diplomatic "statement", we noted something tangentially troubling: " a quick look at the latest positioning of US aircraft carriers, amphibious ready groups, and other navies around the globe shows a gaping hole in the region of the East or South China Sea, and even in proximity to Japan, a place where the US navy traditionally has maintained at least one carrier group.  In fact, according to Stratfor, the only active carrier group is USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CSG, conducting naval operations in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe."

As it turned out, the Eisenhower carrier group was on its way back to dock in Norfolk, VA, which means that for the next several weeks, not only will there be no U.S. Navy aircraft carrier in the Middle East or the South China Sea, but as Fox News reports, "there will be no American aircraft carriers deployed at sea anywhere else in the world, despite a host of worldwide threats facing the United States."
The absence of a deployed U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, long seen as a symbol of American power projection, is noteworthy. According to Fox, it is believed to be the first time since World War II that at least one U.S. aircraft carrier has not been deployed.]
Anonymous sent:

Re Assange??? I just watched parts of his interview with Sean Hannity and I agree it's not him. Face too puffy (could be sick or confined too long, but I don't think that's it), speech cadence a bit different with pauses not like his, eyes not as powerfully focused, seems weaker (not in a sickly way, in a not strong Julian way). Maybe a clone? Maybe the white hats took him from the embassy that night and he's been in the US? But he doesn't seem like the real old Julian, just not strong enough a "signature" (soul) as Julian. We have been hearing Trump WAS selected a few years ago to be Pres, it's not just a now thing. I think there is a lot of fudging, smudging of the lines of reality, but, like you say, if it gets us to a restoration of the republic, so be it." 

My response: I would not be one bit surprised at all if America was, right now, in the midst of a white hat revolution. If Trump was "selected" (and I doubt that, ) but if he was, he would be an un surprising choice of the white hat community because he has proven he is not simple or stupid with anything, despite what the MSM claims, and that he would be a prime choice for fixing the nation.

Exactly opposite to what the MSM is saying, Trump is, in all reality, the most qualified president this nation has ever had. If anyone could fix this country, Trump is definitely it and his business track record stands as solid evidence of this. Name one president that has actually run a for real for profit business that was not just a cesspool of corruption like White Water Development. Trump is the only one. That takes the type of brains that would be PERFECT if put in charge of a nation.

.

It looks to me like the 

white hats are winning

Assange (tm) spoke yet again, and once again said Russia did not do the hacks for Wikileaks

I am not convinced it is the real Assange. However, that may be irrelevant because he's out there saying the right things, and that would mean the white hats won that battle. Remember, I always said there was a war going on in America's intelligence, and that it was predominantly good people who were being misused by dark forces. I believe 100 percent that white hats in American intelligence stole the election back after Soros and team Hillary successfully stole it, and that's why there was such a fight afterward.


As far as I see it, Soros got his *ss handed to him on a paper plate, as did the rest of the Jewish community and now all they can do is make threats against performers to not play at Trump's inauguration, run fake news stories about whatever, and troll team against Trump in the blogs and comment sections. They've been neutered after white hat NSA and others showed them who the boss still is.

If American intelligence can still white hat fake Assange (and I think that is the case) and get away with it, and then gets Trump above them replacing the absolute manure at the top, it is going to be golden days because they will actually work FOR us instead of against us. And that would actually be good.

Trump convinced Ford to build a new manufacturing facility in the U.S. rather than Mexico

Trump stopped Ford from building a $1.6 billion dollar manufacturing facility in Mexico, and instead invest $600 million in updating an existing facility in Michigan, and hire Americans instead.

Chevy Cruz to be heavily taxed

When I saw the Chevy Cruze in Mexico for the first time, I did not know it would be allowed to be sold in America. It looks like what is called a "world car", which is a type of car that is perfectly OK but lacks American approval. On top of that, many of Chevy's cheaper cars in Mexico are made by Daewoo, which is a brand that got rejected in America 10 years ago because it did not last. I spoke to a car dealer about the Aveo who did not know that, and he said it was absolute garbage compared to Volkswagen's similarly priced cars. Since the Cruze is from the same family of cars, I figured the Cruze would be blocked from the U.S. (though I never confirmed it is made by Daewoo).


At any rate, if Chevy wants to sell the Cruze in the U.S. they are either going to have to build it in the U.S. or face a steep import tax now. Don't forget - When Chevy was bailed out, Obama picked the new CEO and that can't possibly be good.


Trump is on the ball with this. Chevy is going to have to be an American car company now.


By the way, Fiat bought Chrysler a few years ago, and from what I can judge from Fiat in Mexico, it is going to turn Chrysler into America's Nissan, Fiat's Mexican models are absolutely fantastic. What will Fiat gain from buying Chrysler? My guess is a decent automatic transmission and that is about all.

Dear MSM: You cannot dream up a bogus reality and then call me "fake" for not being part of it!

Musicians obviously facing death of career for singing at Trump inauguration

Not lip synch - Mariah Carey was definitely sabotaged

For the technical details explaining the sabotage, scroll down to the headline "Sabotaged over Trump". This is all one big report, that's just the Mariah specific part of it.
Image result for IMAGE OF MARIAH NEW YEARS EVE

DISCLAIMER: THE EXPUNGEMENT IS SO COMPLETE THERE IS NO WAY I CAN PROVE MARIAH WAS GOING TO SING AT TRUMP'S INAUGURATION ANYMORE. SO CALL THIS A FAKE NEWS REPORT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT. AND JUST IN CASE I AM WRONG, THIS IS FAKE NEWS. After all I could have been delusional or mistaken when I thought I saw that reported on Dec 31. Ok, now that that is out of the way, Mariah was DEFINITELY sabotaged on New Years, NO IFS OR BUTS and I can definitely prove at least that.


AS SOON AS I POSTED THE PORTION OF THIS REPORT TITLED "SABOTAGED OVER TRUMP: Mariah Carey's New Years performance" yesterday I got kicked offline and have not been able to do anything since other than get the report back up this morning. After I put it back up, I got cut off entirely again. I messed up by not having the site in combat mode, it is now. I was going to take this report off the front page until I got attacked over it AGAIN, a second time which can only mean this one is a hot topic that kikedom wants obliviated.

PERFORMERS BLACK BALLED OVER TRUMP INAUGURATION

Want to see your career vaporized in a flash? Just try performing for Trump, WE OWN ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA AND WE WILL DESTROY YOU - your friendly neighborhood Jew


The expungement monster is treating the topic of performers and Trump's inauguration like kryptonite, and is nuking absolutely everything on the topic and replacing truth with lies and pure fabrications. For example, if you look through different reports about who said no to Trump, you will discover that Gene Simmons of Kiss "said no to trump" only to discover later that he said no when he never said no, and is shocked that the story was out there. Not too surprisingly, when it comes to musicians rejecting inauguration invites, fake news is predominantly all there is.

Keep this in mind when you read the Mariah Carey report. I could have sworn I saw headlines on Dec 31 that Mariah was going to perform at Trump's inauguration. Then she got blown away at the New Years performance, which was OBVIOUS and PROVABLE SABOTAGE.

There is a de-facto boycott of performers for Trump's inauguration. That is true. However, a majority of the stories about performers turning down invitations are false. It is another fake news script. And any musicians that did say yes are getting back stabbed and all stories about it are expunged, The left wants a story line about all musicians refusing to perform for Trump out there, and they are willing to destroy absolutely any musician who says yes, and have expunged all reports of musicians saying yes. Mariah Carey, as far as I knew but now can't prove, said YES and was destroyed within a day for saying yes. The only thing out there now is a fake news story on National Report where Trump has now rejected her after her New Years disaster which was definite, obvious sabotage.

How bad is the expungement monster? January 1, after Mariah's disaster, there were reports about Trump inviting her to perform for the inauguration despite the disaster, and now even those reports are expunged. So when you read the Mariah Carey sabotage report, keep in mind that the expungement monster has turned into a black hole, and you won't find a peep on the topic of her performing at the inauguration. After she got destroyed on New Years, which is easy to prove, she probably wont.

When I originally tried to post the following yesterday, my connection got shut down and it took until this morning to get back online. Someone does not want this type of story out there. This one is kryptonite, but unfortunately, since everything is expunged now, I can't prove it is true with links.


SABOTAGED OVER TRUMP - Mariah Carey's New Years performance

Mariah Carey was not lip synching New Years, it was hoax sabotage.

Here is a one line proof it was sabotage: If Mariah was lip synching, why would she have cared about her microphone not working, or the vocal monitor system not working? If she was lip synching she'd have just listened to the main speakers because a live mic and monitor system would not be needed. The fact she had to stop due to a monitor issue proves 100 percent she was not faking it, and got sabotaged. If it appeared to be memorex, that was part of the sabotage.


I can technically prove she was punished with sabotage during the New Years performance. There is no other way that kind of disaster could have happened outside of willful intent and I explain why fully in this report.

Mariah Carey offered to sing at Trump's inauguration despite the performer boycott. She was not on the schedule yet because it happened right before New Years, but it did get reported. These reports are rapidly being expunged after they destroyed her for it on New Years and the only thing I can find now are reports where she was asked not to. 

Update: Now even these reports are gone. Obviously she would not be asked not to if she did not agree to. If she does decide to go ahead and perform for Trump, she will now obviously be kicked out of the business. The control matrix over anyone who has been allowed to go mainstream in the music business really is locked down that tight.

No matter what, even if the inauguration was not an issue it was sabotage, probably prosecutable sabotage, pure and simple.

This the technical proof of how the sabotage happened:

At any major performance, there are main speakers that the people listen to, but on stage those speakers sound distant, out of balance and weak and cannot be used as a reference for singing or anything else. For reference, at all major performances, the singers and players all have what are called stage monitors on the floor in front of them, that blast what they are doing straight in their faces very loud, so they can hear exactly what they are doing, and what it sounds like to the crowd. This can also be handled via earpieces which is what Mariah would use because she moves around a lot. If this gets cut off, the performer is totally screwed. There simply is no way to sound good over the main speakers. If you can't hear the music clearly, you can't sing to it or do anything else to stay in tune or in balance.


When Mariah was about to perform, they cut her microphone feed to the monitor, so she could not hear herself in the music. That will screw a musician every time. It will ALWAYS end in disaster. The fact her "voice continued" when she took the microphone away from her face is irrelevant. Here is why:

In every track like what Mariah Carey does there are over dubbed back up tracks that provide support to the main singer. The fact "her voice" came out of the speakers even after she took the microphone away is irrelevant because they always layer their voices. If there was not a real issue and she did not intend to sing, she'd have just listened to the mains and faked it. Instead she "sounded awful". That proves she got messed with while using back up tracks. Everyone uses back up tracks, except for maybe bands like Styx, and groups like Pink Floyd. And even those musicians will get destroyed if their performance through the stage monitors is cut. Any time a solo artist has harmony in their own voices, pre recorded vocals are used because it is the only way that can happen. And if the monitor feed is cut, disaster will be the only result. No one can handle that. And it will make them look VERY stupid to people who don't know the details behind how performances are done, and what is needed.


My conclusion: There is no conceivable way she was not sabotaged WITH INTENT. And I am 100 percent confident they did this to her because she did not back down on singing for Trump during the inauguration. It does not matter that the reports regarding her acceptance are now expunged, because it was indeed reported for a brief period on Dec 31 but I did not care to post it because that's not my usual type of topic and I did not think it was unusual. They played the same microphone/speaker games on Trump during the first debate. People did not realize that Trump could not hear his own voice during the debate. He was winging it without a microphone as far as he knew it, and it confused him badly. But he still pulled it off because he did not have to sing and stay in tune, and because he has nerves of steel.

I am certain New years was a punishment and a message to Mariah, and that is all there is to it. Her producers know what went on, and said it was done to her on purpose. It is definitely prosecutable. Clearly, the inauguration is exactly what it was about. And why was my internet cut right in the middle of my work on this story? I might be the only one out there who said what actually happened.