By Jim Stone
Gas situation in Mexico
Anonymous sent:
Hello Jim, any update on the situation in Mexico, I live in Mexico City and in seems that all this stuff of blocking roads and gas stations is in full action, tomorrow January 4th people are asking to block major banks branches and shopping malls. This is real? because there are a lot of political actors behind scenes. Any thoughts?"
My response: The gas shutdown is real. On Dec 31, the day before the big event, I filled a 20 liter gas can I had, and smelled gas in the car. The gas can was sealed. I pulled into another gas station and checked it. Unbelievably, it was leaking through a pin hole in the side. So I ran into the gas station, bought a 20 liter water bottle, emptied it, and poured the gas in. Now I have so much gas in addition to what I already purchased that the "mosquito" Fiat I have is going to run for a bare minimum of 6 weeks if we waste gas like normal. If i try to save gas it ought to last 12 weeks. So a leaky gas can marked the end of my gas drama. I'll see what is up at the stations. But I won't be impacted it for a good long time.
Word on the street is that people are going to go absolutely ballistic over the gas situation, so I will have to wait and see. Major protests are scheduled for the city I am in. Claudia has already informed me that I will not be going!
[In Mexico when they speak about 'people',what they really mean are the cartel's like here D.C]
Mixed reactions to Assange with Hannity
Some are saying it's not him, others are saying it is. I am undecided, but will say this: He was taken from the embassy in early October, right when they said his internet got cut. I watched a live cam someone set up that night. He was not there afterward. Whatever happened after that is whatever happened. And if he is not the real Assange now, he's on our side anyway so the point is moot.
[Russia NOT the source D.C]
One big possibility: It is the real Assange, but he's been put through hell and might not even know it. Maybe evil people had him, and lost control of him after Trump won. Any possibility is on the table, but one thing is certain: He was not at the embassy after the "internet was cut".
[Then there is this from Hillary's hit team from media matters who are in it up to their eye balls on the cover up of all things pizza D.C]
America's aircraft carriers docked
I have read numerous reports around the web that state America's aircraft carriers are all docked
Then I got reminded to post it when Anonymous sent:
Hey Jim! What do you make of Obama docking all of Americas air craft carriers. Keep up the good work.
My response: If this is true and not just internet rumor (and it probably is true) it would obviously be done before kicking off a huge war Obama wanted America to lose. That's a no brainer. But there is one huge problem Obama faces if that is the goal
What would that problem be? Answer: Russia is not stupid, nor is China, and absent America launching nukes, I am certain Russia is going to be willing to absorb all losses and ignore all provocations over the next two weeks and wait for Trump to put it right.
No doubt China is upset about Trump's attitude toward them, but there is no way China could ever deny that Trump has the correct attitude. It is not something they could justify war over, and I doubt they'd actually want war anyway. Putin clearly does not want a war. So what will Obama's bringing the aircraft carriers home actually accomplish? Sadly for him, I'd say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING except the saving of a little cash. I bet that's just where they will sit too - in American harbors, once Trump gets in. They will no doubt be sent out for training exercises but for as long as Trump is president, my guess is that is all they will be used for.
[Last weekend, when commenting on China's public demonstration of its one and only aircraft carrier, which China then proceeded to sail in close proximity to Taiwan to make a clear diplomatic "statement", we noted something tangentially troubling: " a quick look at the latest positioning of US aircraft carriers, amphibious ready groups, and other navies around the globe shows a gaping hole in the region of the East or South China Sea, and even in proximity to Japan, a place where the US navy traditionally has maintained at least one carrier group. In fact, according to Stratfor, the only active carrier group is USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CSG, conducting naval operations in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe."
As it turned out, the Eisenhower carrier group was on its way back to dock in Norfolk, VA, which means that for the next several weeks, not only will there be no U.S. Navy aircraft carrier in the Middle East or the South China Sea, but as Fox News reports, "there will be no American aircraft carriers deployed at sea anywhere else in the world, despite a host of worldwide threats facing the United States."
The absence of a deployed U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, long seen as a symbol of American power projection, is noteworthy. According to Fox, it is believed to be the first time since World War II that at least one U.S. aircraft carrier has not been deployed.]
Anonymous sent:
Re Assange??? I just watched parts of his interview with Sean Hannity and I agree it's not him. Face too puffy (could be sick or confined too long, but I don't think that's it), speech cadence a bit different with pauses not like his, eyes not as powerfully focused, seems weaker (not in a sickly way, in a not strong Julian way). Maybe a clone? Maybe the white hats took him from the embassy that night and he's been in the US? But he doesn't seem like the real old Julian, just not strong enough a "signature" (soul) as Julian. We have been hearing Trump WAS selected a few years ago to be Pres, it's not just a now thing. I think there is a lot of fudging, smudging of the lines of reality, but, like you say, if it gets us to a restoration of the republic, so be it."
My response: I would not be one bit surprised at all if America was, right now, in the midst of a white hat revolution. If Trump was "selected" (and I doubt that, ) but if he was, he would be an un surprising choice of the white hat community because he has proven he is not simple or stupid with anything, despite what the MSM claims, and that he would be a prime choice for fixing the nation.
Exactly opposite to what the MSM is saying, Trump is, in all reality, the most qualified president this nation has ever had. If anyone could fix this country, Trump is definitely it and his business track record stands as solid evidence of this. Name one president that has actually run a for real for profit business that was not just a cesspool of corruption like White Water Development. Trump is the only one. That takes the type of brains that would be PERFECT if put in charge of a nation.
.
It looks to me like the
white hats are winning
Assange (tm) spoke yet again, and once again said Russia did not do the hacks for Wikileaks
I am not convinced it is the real Assange. However, that may be irrelevant because he's out there saying the right things, and that would mean the white hats won that battle. Remember, I always said there was a war going on in America's intelligence, and that it was predominantly good people who were being misused by dark forces. I believe 100 percent that white hats in American intelligence stole the election back after Soros and team Hillary successfully stole it, and that's why there was such a fight afterward.
As far as I see it, Soros got his *ss handed to him on a paper plate, as did the rest of the Jewish community and now all they can do is make threats against performers to not play at Trump's inauguration, run fake news stories about whatever, and troll team against Trump in the blogs and comment sections. They've been neutered after white hat NSA and others showed them who the boss still is.
If American intelligence can still white hat fake Assange (and I think that is the case) and get away with it, and then gets Trump above them replacing the absolute manure at the top, it is going to be golden days because they will actually work FOR us instead of against us. And that would actually be good.
Trump convinced Ford to build a new manufacturing facility in the U.S. rather than Mexico
Trump stopped Ford from building a $1.6 billion dollar manufacturing facility in Mexico, and instead invest $600 million in updating an existing facility in Michigan, and hire Americans instead.
Chevy Cruz to be heavily taxed
When I saw the Chevy Cruze in Mexico for the first time, I did not know it would be allowed to be sold in America. It looks like what is called a "world car", which is a type of car that is perfectly OK but lacks American approval. On top of that, many of Chevy's cheaper cars in Mexico are made by Daewoo, which is a brand that got rejected in America 10 years ago because it did not last. I spoke to a car dealer about the Aveo who did not know that, and he said it was absolute garbage compared to Volkswagen's similarly priced cars. Since the Cruze is from the same family of cars, I figured the Cruze would be blocked from the U.S. (though I never confirmed it is made by Daewoo).
At any rate, if Chevy wants to sell the Cruze in the U.S. they are either going to have to build it in the U.S. or face a steep import tax now. Don't forget - When Chevy was bailed out, Obama picked the new CEO and that can't possibly be good.
Trump is on the ball with this. Chevy is going to have to be an American car company now.
By the way, Fiat bought Chrysler a few years ago, and from what I can judge from Fiat in Mexico, it is going to turn Chrysler into America's Nissan, Fiat's Mexican models are absolutely fantastic. What will Fiat gain from buying Chrysler? My guess is a decent automatic transmission and that is about all.
Dear MSM: You cannot dream up a bogus reality and then call me "fake" for not being part of it!
Musicians obviously facing death of career for singing at Trump inauguration
Not lip synch - Mariah Carey was definitely sabotaged
For the technical details explaining the sabotage, scroll down to the headline "Sabotaged over Trump". This is all one big report, that's just the Mariah specific part of it.
DISCLAIMER: THE EXPUNGEMENT IS SO COMPLETE THERE IS NO WAY I CAN PROVE MARIAH WAS GOING TO SING AT TRUMP'S INAUGURATION ANYMORE. SO CALL THIS A FAKE NEWS REPORT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT. AND JUST IN CASE I AM WRONG, THIS IS FAKE NEWS. After all I could have been delusional or mistaken when I thought I saw that reported on Dec 31. Ok, now that that is out of the way, Mariah was DEFINITELY sabotaged on New Years, NO IFS OR BUTS and I can definitely prove at least that.
AS SOON AS I POSTED THE PORTION OF THIS REPORT TITLED "SABOTAGED OVER TRUMP: Mariah Carey's New Years performance" yesterday I got kicked offline and have not been able to do anything since other than get the report back up this morning. After I put it back up, I got cut off entirely again. I messed up by not having the site in combat mode, it is now. I was going to take this report off the front page until I got attacked over it AGAIN, a second time which can only mean this one is a hot topic that kikedom wants obliviated.
PERFORMERS BLACK BALLED OVER TRUMP INAUGURATION
Want to see your career vaporized in a flash? Just try performing for Trump, WE OWN ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA AND WE WILL DESTROY YOU - your friendly neighborhood Jew
The expungement monster is treating the topic of performers and Trump's inauguration like kryptonite, and is nuking absolutely everything on the topic and replacing truth with lies and pure fabrications. For example, if you look through different reports about who said no to Trump, you will discover that Gene Simmons of Kiss "said no to trump" only to discover later that he said no when he never said no, and is shocked that the story was out there. Not too surprisingly, when it comes to musicians rejecting inauguration invites, fake news is predominantly all there is.
Keep this in mind when you read the Mariah Carey report. I could have sworn I saw headlines on Dec 31 that Mariah was going to perform at Trump's inauguration. Then she got blown away at the New Years performance, which was OBVIOUS and PROVABLE SABOTAGE.
There is a de-facto boycott of performers for Trump's inauguration. That is true. However, a majority of the stories about performers turning down invitations are false. It is another fake news script. And any musicians that did say yes are getting back stabbed and all stories about it are expunged, The left wants a story line about all musicians refusing to perform for Trump out there, and they are willing to destroy absolutely any musician who says yes, and have expunged all reports of musicians saying yes. Mariah Carey, as far as I knew but now can't prove, said YES and was destroyed within a day for saying yes. The only thing out there now is a fake news story on National Report where Trump has now rejected her after her New Years disaster which was definite, obvious sabotage.
How bad is the expungement monster? January 1, after Mariah's disaster, there were reports about Trump inviting her to perform for the inauguration despite the disaster, and now even those reports are expunged. So when you read the Mariah Carey sabotage report, keep in mind that the expungement monster has turned into a black hole, and you won't find a peep on the topic of her performing at the inauguration. After she got destroyed on New Years, which is easy to prove, she probably wont.
When I originally tried to post the following yesterday, my connection got shut down and it took until this morning to get back online. Someone does not want this type of story out there. This one is kryptonite, but unfortunately, since everything is expunged now, I can't prove it is true with links.
SABOTAGED OVER TRUMP - Mariah Carey's New Years performance
Mariah Carey was not lip synching New Years, it was hoax sabotage.
Here is a one line proof it was sabotage: If Mariah was lip synching, why would she have cared about her microphone not working, or the vocal monitor system not working? If she was lip synching she'd have just listened to the main speakers because a live mic and monitor system would not be needed. The fact she had to stop due to a monitor issue proves 100 percent she was not faking it, and got sabotaged. If it appeared to be memorex, that was part of the sabotage.
I can technically prove she was punished with sabotage during the New Years performance. There is no other way that kind of disaster could have happened outside of willful intent and I explain why fully in this report.
Mariah Carey offered to sing at Trump's inauguration despite the performer boycott. She was not on the schedule yet because it happened right before New Years, but it did get reported. These reports are rapidly being expunged after they destroyed her for it on New Years and the only thing I can find now are reports where she was asked not to.
Update: Now even these reports are gone. Obviously she would not be asked not to if she did not agree to. If she does decide to go ahead and perform for Trump, she will now obviously be kicked out of the business. The control matrix over anyone who has been allowed to go mainstream in the music business really is locked down that tight.
No matter what, even if the inauguration was not an issue it was sabotage, probably prosecutable sabotage, pure and simple.
This the technical proof of how the sabotage happened:
At any major performance, there are main speakers that the people listen to, but on stage those speakers sound distant, out of balance and weak and cannot be used as a reference for singing or anything else. For reference, at all major performances, the singers and players all have what are called stage monitors on the floor in front of them, that blast what they are doing straight in their faces very loud, so they can hear exactly what they are doing, and what it sounds like to the crowd. This can also be handled via earpieces which is what Mariah would use because she moves around a lot. If this gets cut off, the performer is totally screwed. There simply is no way to sound good over the main speakers. If you can't hear the music clearly, you can't sing to it or do anything else to stay in tune or in balance.
When Mariah was about to perform, they cut her microphone feed to the monitor, so she could not hear herself in the music. That will screw a musician every time. It will ALWAYS end in disaster. The fact her "voice continued" when she took the microphone away from her face is irrelevant. Here is why:
In every track like what Mariah Carey does there are over dubbed back up tracks that provide support to the main singer. The fact "her voice" came out of the speakers even after she took the microphone away is irrelevant because they always layer their voices. If there was not a real issue and she did not intend to sing, she'd have just listened to the mains and faked it. Instead she "sounded awful". That proves she got messed with while using back up tracks. Everyone uses back up tracks, except for maybe bands like Styx, and groups like Pink Floyd. And even those musicians will get destroyed if their performance through the stage monitors is cut. Any time a solo artist has harmony in their own voices, pre recorded vocals are used because it is the only way that can happen. And if the monitor feed is cut, disaster will be the only result. No one can handle that. And it will make them look VERY stupid to people who don't know the details behind how performances are done, and what is needed.
My conclusion: There is no conceivable way she was not sabotaged WITH INTENT. And I am 100 percent confident they did this to her because she did not back down on singing for Trump during the inauguration. It does not matter that the reports regarding her acceptance are now expunged, because it was indeed reported for a brief period on Dec 31 but I did not care to post it because that's not my usual type of topic and I did not think it was unusual. They played the same microphone/speaker games on Trump during the first debate. People did not realize that Trump could not hear his own voice during the debate. He was winging it without a microphone as far as he knew it, and it confused him badly. But he still pulled it off because he did not have to sing and stay in tune, and because he has nerves of steel.
I am certain New years was a punishment and a message to Mariah, and that is all there is to it. Her producers know what went on, and said it was done to her on purpose. It is definitely prosecutable. Clearly, the inauguration is exactly what it was about. And why was my internet cut right in the middle of my work on this story? I might be the only one out there who said what actually happened.
No comments:
Post a Comment