BLOCKBUSTER: LANGUAGE GAFFE STRONGLY INDICATES CIA INTELLIGENCE REPORT ON ELECTION INFLUENCE WAS OUT SOURCED TO INDIA
The intelligence report referenced in the report below is HERE. The only things of substance in the report are from 2012 and then they are tenuous at best. The report has on almost every page
"This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign".
Look at that statement. The last part is "on key elements of the influence campaign". Do you get that? ON THE INFLUENCE CAMPAIGN. Look at how that is said! IT IS WRITTEN WRONG.
The report is SO FREAKING SLOPPY they did not even state the disclaimer correctly! It was probably outsourced to India because the language gaffe is identical to what happens with people who speak Tamil or Hindi, India does a lot of documents for the U.S., and the gaffe was repeated over and over again, (at least 23 times) including in the body of the text of the report!
Additionally, The report CLEARLY STATES that there was no assessment made on the impact of Russian influence on the 2016 election, even though it is advertised as such all through it! Here is a direct quote, that shows the gaffes. I'll get a capture up later, but for now the site is in combat mode so I cannot upload the capture. This is a text copy/paste from the report:
Scope and Sourcing
Information available as of 29 December 2016 was used in the preparation of this product.
Scope
This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA), which draws on intelligence information collected and disseminated by those three agencies. It covers the motivation and scope of Moscow's intentions regarding US elections and Moscow's use of cyber tools and media campaigns to influence US public opinion. The assessment focuses on activities aimed at the 2016 US presidential election and draws on our understanding of previous Russian influence operations. When we use the term we it refers to an assessment by all three agencies.
* This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment. This documents conclusions are identical to the highly classified assessment, but this document does not include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence on key elements of the influence campaign. Given the redaction's, we made minor edits purely for readability and flow.
HERE'S THE KICKER FOLKS: DRUM ROLL -
We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.
OK, LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: They said, in their own words, that they did not make an assessment of the impact the Russian activities had on the 2016 election. So how then, is any of this charade even relevant at all?
So now we have: 1. The report is so sloppy that there is a repeated quote that appears 23 times that is worded like this:
"This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment. This documents conclusions are identical to the highly classified assessment, but this document does not include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence on key elements of the influence campaign" and with that gaffe in it 23 times we are supposed to think it is serious??!!??
2. An open admission that the report does not even consider the influence Russia had on the 2016 election, AND:
3. As Sputnik News pointed out in the next report - Old and outdated data used, this report was actually finished in 2012, dredged up and re-badged, decorated, and sold as something that was relevant for an entirely un related election in 2016.
So there you have it, the BEST nuke they have against Trump and it is a LOAD OF POORLY WRITTEN OUTDATED UNRELATED CRAP.
Good for a laugh. Banana republic all the way!
Intelligence report that proves
Russia rigged the election was from 2012
Yep, they had their report allright, and it was finalized years before Trump even decided to be a politician. Remember, all the way back in 2012 when they cracked down on PressTV and got them removed from all broadcasts that could be picked up in the U.S.? THAT. It was part of the same, with nothing new since 2012.
This did happen in 2012. I remember when they put tons of pressure on RT and actually succeeded in wiping out PressTv. The web site is still there, but PressTV was effectively dead. The intelligence report they threw at Trump was simply that old report from 2012, which means that in the context of Trump's election it meant absolutely nothing and is completely irrelevant.
For the icing on the cake, it turns out that the television programs RT was running in 2012 that the intelligence report was so against were discontinued before the 2016 election cycle even began. This is why we were told "the intelligence is real" and "no you cannot see it", because yes, it was a real report but NO, it meant NOTHING this election cycle.
This is a quote from Sputnik News, and a few others are starting to pick up on this also.
"A highly-anticipated declassified US intelligence report, aimed to prove that Russia supported Donald Trump, has turned out to be a huge embarrassment. The annex that contained factual material that was thought to provide evidence of RT influencing the American public was compiled in December 2012, right after the reelection of Barack Obama.
The report focuses on television shows and interviews that took place four years before Trump was elected, and well before he was even a politician.
In Annex A of the report, intelligence agencies claim that Kremlin's TV Seeks To Influence Politics, Fuel Discontent in US. Buried at the bottom of that page is a note stating, This annex was originally published on 11 December 2012 by the Open Source Center, now the Open Source Enterprise.
Fort Lauderdale shooting
For some reason I do not think anything will come of this. Other people are asking what I think, so here is my opinion:
This was done by the U.S. military intelligence or CIA probably under final directive from Obama to convince Trump and/or set the stage for gun confiscation from the mentally ill and vets. I have read over several reports and this is my conclusion:
American military intelligence either found a susceptible military enlistee or a susceptible member of the public to brainwash and program and/or hypnotize into doing it. It may or may not have been real, but the so-called shooter thought it was. They made sure he got on the plane with a gun in his baggage, to use at his destination. It may have been loaded with blanks. When he got to his destination he executed his programming and woke up.
Under interrogation he remembered being taken by American intelligence (CIA or other) and forced to watch ISIS videos. He knew they were American intelligence, so they must have been wearing uniforms. He probably had it all happen in the jail of a large military base to keep it concealed as well as possible. He has specifically stated he was taken and forced to watch ISIS videos. And during this time, they probably programmed him to "convert to Islam" as the icing on their psy op, and he probably does not even know Al Fatiha or any other sura of the Quran which is required for prayer. It would actually be a complex job to accomplish that, and it appears his programmers were too sloppy for that.
My guess is that all of it was dreamed up and rushed to completion AFTER Trump won the presidency because the patsy is not adequately programmed and seems to be remembering everything. That would be a GIGANTIC OOPS. They are supposed to either be dead or so mentally wiped out that nothing of the sort that is being said by him would ever be said. They screwed this one up big time.
This was obviously done to justify more "terror checks" on airplanes, to back stab veterans, to get gun control legislation passed - and it was a HUGE SCREW UP. You do not have your patsy saying American intelligence forced him to watch ISIS videos before doing this unless it is a MAJOR screw job, SUCH A MAJOR SCREW JOB that it is my guess white hats screwed it up on purpose after receiving orders to do it that they did not agree with.
By all measure, they did a SH*TTY job of programming the guy, made sure he still had a huge amount of his memory, put him on the plane with blanks, and the rest of the story was scammed by a lying media and actors. If the bullets were real, whoever programmed him to do this screwed it up ON PURPOSE, AS A MINIMUM. There is no conceivable way he'd have arrived knowing he was forced to watch ISIS videos absent an enormous and/or purposeful screw up.
Trump is going to look at this, and rather than enact legislation HE IS GOING TO DRAIN THE SWAMP. This kind of crap is NOT going to fly with him.
TRUMP SAVED WHAT IS LEFT OF CALIFORNIA, FAKE "DROUGHT" STOPPED AFTER ELECTION
Sounds ridiculous? Well, it is NOT. In 2013 I proved that there was no drought (other than one that was Haarp induced), and that in conjunction with the modestly effective Haarp induced drought leftists in California drained California's dams as fast as they could be safely drained, and dumped all of California's agricultural water straight into the San Joaquin river ON PURPOSE in the name of a spurious fish called the Delta Smelt. It was clearly done for the sole purpose of wiping out the orchards in the San Joaquin and replacing them with GMO, as well as bankrupting farmers so corrupted elite could buy up prime lands for practically nothing.
Obama did absolutely nothing to stop this direct criminal action against California agriculture, and now that Trump has arrived as the police man, they have stopped the Haarp drought and are as RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE gushing rain and snow water into the dams to re-fill them and claim the drought ended naturally. This may all sound far fetched to those who don't know about weather modification and just how corrupt and evil the elitist Democrats are, but I have irrefutable proof here on this site that proves that in 2011 California got so much water it filled the dams up and they simply re-drained them while giving California growers practically nothing. HERE WE GO:
FROM MARCH 28 2014 - PHOTOS OF DAM DRAINAGE AS IT HAPPENED IN 2011-2012, THE END of the California orange
The following photos are absolute proof they drained the dams on purpose, causing severe flooding and NEVER gave california growers a SINGLE DROP for the sole purpose of killing all the orange orchards, grape vineyards and almond groves. It is important to note that with any war effort waged by the usurpers of a conquered government, that fake documentation will be produced by the government to support the lie. That is when you have to use photos to prove that the documents, which show a drought and reduced out flows, are fake.
HERE IS THE PROOF. 2011 was called a drought year that was so bad they could not give the farmers any water (heads up, this is good).
But how can that be true when the Sacramento river looked like THIS:
WELL, People noticed that, so they hatched the lie that the flooding happened because the rain was selective, and all fell in the valley and not in the mountains, which is why the dams were "empty" and they could not give the growers any water. And the media stuck with the lie, and the people trusted the media. BIG MISTAKE.
THIS is how it looked in the mountains:
THIS is how it looked on the outflow of the dams
AND THIS IS HOW IT LOOKED BEHIND THE DAMS IN 2011, THEY WERE CHOCK FULL TO THE BRIM, AND STILL THE GROWERS GOT NO WATER:
CHECK MATE, THE ENEMY OF AMERICA, THE NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA 21 ZIONIST, HAS BEEN BUSTED. HOW CAN YOU GO FROM HAVING THE DAMS BE LIKE THIS, ABOVE, IN 2011, GIVE THE GROWERS NO WATER AND THEN HAVE THE DAMS LOOK LIKE THIS, BELOW IN 2013? THEY DON'T JUST DRY UP, YOU ARE BUSTED.
My guess for all of this? It is possible they are bankrupting all the growers by killing all the legacy trees via denial of water, trees which are not GMO, so that one billionaire can move into the valley, buy it all, plant it entirely with GMO and ram GMO down America's throat. It could also be that they are planning a mass starvation of the American people, and the San Joaquin, which produces practically everything from almonds to grapes to strawberries to oranges, enough for much of the world, has to be killed before they can actually succeed in starving America. With much of what the San Joaquin produces, you can't get it back in a year, it will take decades so it won't do any good to just start managing the water properly once everything is dead, it will take years to come back. By then the starve off will have been accomplished.
UPDATE:
They responded to this article QUICKLY. There is no underground water left as some state, all of it was pumped out in 2009 and 2010 to save the orchards when they cut the water off, and now the ocean has back flowed all the way to the valley and they can only pump salt. The water is GONE. And WHY was the San Joaquin at flood stage for three consecutive years during a "drought" if they were not letting the dams go to kill the San Joaquin valley ON PURPOSE as I clearly show below?
The entire San Joaquin report follows.
I have taken an important chart from that report which was produced by Forbes and moved it to the top (for the 2017 re-post) so people can clearly see that California did not have a significant drought up until at least 2014 and that the photographic proof above is definitely real. I will look for an updated chart to show 2015 and 2016 which might show the effects of weather modification and a real drought for the last two years but the orchards were so killed off by the time I posted this chart from 2014 that I basically gave up on the topic.
Permalink
I am re-posting this with updates because it is so important.
I was actually in the San Joaquin valley when the effort to destroy it started. In 2008 I saw the Sacramento river carrying all the water from the dams straight to the ocean, it was obvious they opened the dams to intentionally drain them. During this time, when the river should have been at a low point, it was at flood stage and even after having a lot of experience with dangerous rivers such as the Mississippi, and having seen the Yukon at flood stage, the Sacramento river was absolutely spooky to see at this time - obvious death for even an experienced swimmer.
During this time, the media was pushing the lie about how water was limited, all the while they were draining it to the ocean - "limited" because "there was a drought." But reality is that the rain in California has been within a perfectly normal range for the last 10 years, there has been no drought and even if there was a drought the reservoirs that were built to supply the San Joaquin had enough reserve, absent being drained, to keep California agriculture alive for a full five years with no rain at all.
Now, (for the last six months) there really has been less rain than usual, and it is obviously caused by chem trails and Haarp. They are manufacturing a real drought at this time in the hopes that people will not realize that prior to now the rain has been perfectly normal over the last 10 years and STARTING NOW, the San Joaquin should with a truthful lack of rain be able to hold on for five years. Unfortunately the dams are already drained so they will succeed at killing the San Joaquin this summer, the summer of 2014.
The original article follows:
After draining the dams on purpose was done by the "elite" to destroy the San Joaquin valley, Haarp is being used to finish the job with a real drought. Read on, I have proof that this has been in the works for six years.
(scroll down to see it in pictures if you don't have time to read a long article)
FACT:
Many of the orchards and prime agricultural zones have already been intentionally killed via denial of water by the choice of the elite. This was caused by draining all the dams and flushing all the water out to the ocean ON PURPOSE. And if you believe the lies in all the stats and charts used to cover up this horrific fraud of a drought on America,TAKE A LOOK AT THIS VIDEO AND ASK YOURSELF,WHY WOULD THEY LET THAT MUCH WATER GO IF THE DAMS WERE EMPTY? THAT FLOOD SHOULD HAVE BEEN USED TO FILL THEM.
Here is what is really going on -
America's enemies which have taken control of the country by the throat obviously want the San Joaquin gone from America's list of assets. The San Joaquin is a natural desert, which was only brought to life via irrigation projects and reservoirs. No "drought" can change this fact. Several people who are among the "elite", most notably Warren Buffet bought all the reservoirs in violation of law (at least the original law the reservoirs were agreed to be built under) and drained them into the ocean rather than give the water to the farmers (which also violated the water contracts the farmers signed onto) in the name of an imported and not native fish called the Delta Smelt. These fish were brought into California around 100 years ago and are not natural to the area at all.
There has ALWAYS been plenty of water in California. The irrigation projects were vastly overbuilt and were more than enough to handle an extended drought, (which there in fact has not been despite claims) up until now. But once America's enemies among the elite got control of the dams, they simply opened the floodgates and sent all the collected water straight to the ocean down the Sacramento river, causing a large amount of flooding and draining the water supply that California orchards and agriculture needs to survive. And they did it in the name of a fish that did not belong there anyway, an obvious act of war. Since the farmers subsequently did not get their water, a lie of drought was hatched in the mainstream media (including mainstream fake alternative media), a lie laid waste by the rainfall chart that even Rense posted.
This was an act of war against the American people, launched by NWO elitists to destroy America's most prime agricultural zone. Make no mistake, the New World Order crowd absolutely HATES America, and will be America's "friend" only to whatever extent it takes to deceive an ignorant populace long enough to have that populace stand idly by as America's greatest assets are WIPED OUT.
The San Joaquin agricultural zone was far too much of an asset for America's conquerors to tolerate having around, so they just took control via government corruption afforded by rigged elections and shut off the water.
Now there are hundreds of miles of dead orchards there, stretching as far as the eye can see. And the State mandates that the growers cut these dead orchards down, so six years into this war there are equally vast expanses of dead earth that were only a short time ago fertile orchards.
So when you hear MANY in the so called "truth movement" haarp all about how the San Joaquin died because of Fukushima, KNOW THE LIE. MANY IN THE "TRUTH MOVEMENT" HAVE EVOLVED INTO BEING THE ENEMY OF TRUTH. Let's PROVE IT RIGHT NOW, with a few pictures of the San Joaquin from MORE THAN A YEAR AGO, LONG before this so-called "drought" which happens to be Haarp caused and actually is real. REAL BUT IRRELEVEANT, THE SAN JOAQUIN IS ALREADY DEAD.
Here is the California precipitation chart everyone is now quoting. Look at the history here, there have been plenty of other periods that were a little bit dry. The only dry period on the chart is the recent Haarp attack that has spanned five months, since September of 2013 (when the water year starts) up until now, in Feb of 2014. The real drought, the HAARP drought has only been going on for FIVE MONTHS. 5 months won't empty the dams or kill orchards. LOOK AT THE ACCIDENTALLY TRUTHFUL CHART BELOW WHICH WAS POSTED BY FORBES, AND THEN TRY TO EXPLAIN THE FOLLOWING PHOTOS OF EMPTY DAMS. WHY ARE THEY EMPTY ALREADY, WHEN UP TO SEP OF 2013 THE RAIN WAS WITHIN A NORMAL RANGE?
From the chart above, it is OBVIOUS there has been no drought. Even in 2010 and 2011 the liars in the MSM talked all about how little rain California got, and the chart proves that those were both very wet years. But people still trust the MSM, even when getting soaked. The subsequent years were NOT BAD ENOUGH TO MAKE THE DAMS LOOK LIKE THIS:
aaaa
aaaa
The chart from Forbes PROVES: These orchards are NOT dead because of drought and the dams are NOT empty because of drought, they are empty because a few priviledged enemies in the New World order got into America's government and chose to drain them so they can get America by the throat in a future catastrophe THEY ENGINEERED. The enemy would surely love to blame it on Fuku, DO NOT let a lack of knowledge draw you into that trap.
The photo to the left, which Rense posted clearly shows that Haarp is indeed being used to stop the rain from reaching California. But this is being done to create a real drought only AFTER the San Joaquin has been severely damaged from lack of water. 2011 gave the orchards another year, up until 2010 the farmers were able to pump wells to water the valley. But the wells went mostly dry by the end of 2010, and 2011 was a godsend because they had no other water, and were denied it from the reservoirs, water which they got from a very wet year that should have filled the reservoirs. I know, I WAS THERE DURING IT. It rained all the time and this saved the orchards. But after 2011, the orchards took a severe beating from being denied water during a normal precipitation year following a very wet year that should have filled the reservoirs, and this haarp blockage will no doubt be the final death sentence for the San Joaquin, because even if there is an agreement to save the orchards, the NWO crowd already emptied the dams. There is no where to go now.
Barbara wrote:
Hi!
Wow. Finally I am validated. You said exactly what I have been saying, that we have NOT been in a drought, that our water has been normal for years, that yes we had little rain this year but we could see blatant chemtrailing which caused it. I live in Santa Barbara where our Lake Cachuma has gone almost dry. I have considered it might be partly due to fracking, but the water system has no particular connection to oil wells here. When we moved here, SB had been in a drought for 7 years, still the Lake was fairly full. It was, they said, the first day of rain they had had, although they did have a few inches every year prior, just not much. I came from LA where I participated in 3 or 4 dry times when water was rationed. I AGREE WITH YOU that this has been done on purpose. I am a lifelong Californian. I know my environment.
But, I had zero idea, had not heard at all, that they were draining the dams into the ocean. Makes total sense. I do remember one year (1970-ish) when Lake Shasta was almost dry, but it came back the next year. Lake Shasta currently seems to be the focal point of destroying our environment according to Dane Wiggington.
So, Thanks for your article, but I think even if I print it out and give it to my friends and family they will likely dismiss it -- I am continually amazed at how extremely educated people do not see what is happening!
My response: I lived in California as well, in the San Joaquin valley. I knew it HAD TO BE patent b.S. because it rained and rained and rained and rained. That is why the dams were chock full and the San Joaquin had such a huge outflow, because 2010 completely filled the dams, and 2011 produced uncontrollable flooding because the dams were already full and the farmers did not get to use them, so the dams had no reserve capacity left for 2011. Yet the lie prevailed and I can tell you why:
The bankers have propped up the American dollar and made sure everyone got their antidepressants and stayed fat and happy. That keeps them from asking any questions. Hungry people ask questions, and when the hunger starts, the elite want there to be NO WAY to make it go away. That's how wars are often fought, and it will all be blamed on nature because people have been educated into blind stupidity as a preparatory move before killing them like idiots
Anonymous sent:
THOUGHTS ON ASSANGE, his internet cut off and refusal to do the simple thing and show himself has NOT been satisfactorily explained. THINK now the msm has terminally ruined itself how useful it would be for TPTB to have a phoney in his place giving out a bit of sugar to help the lies go down. I for one will be very suspicious unless he can come up with some in depth and believable explanations for what went on last Autumn.
My response: Assange is not selfish. If he was, he would not have screwed his life up the way he did just to get the truth out. It also proves he's not a coward. BOTH of those make "he refused to walk up to the embassy window for all that time to answer the question if he was alive or not" a logical fallacy. He is clearly not stupid enough to have stupidity be a reason, he's not a coward, and he's not a selfish jerk. So why did he never walk up to the window? GOOD QUESTION, EH?
No comments:
Post a Comment